Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

[Sergei Trofimovich]

> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
> 
> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx>

Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!

-- 

  Sergei

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature