Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

[David Miller]

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300

>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
>> 
>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!

Thanks for testing Sergei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/