Re: Sparc-32 doesn't work in 3.1.

[Rob Landley]

On 12/14/2011 01:13 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0300
> 
>>> sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
>>>
>>> The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
>>> but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
>>> symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Was about to send exactly the same. Thanks!
> 
> Thanks for testing Sergei.
> 

Is that the line we're using now?  I'm out of touch...

Tested-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/