Re: [GIT PULL] use generic pci_iomap on all architectures
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu Jan 05 2012 - 16:31:55 EST
Hi Michael,
[I am not *just* picking on you - others do this as well ...]
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:58:36 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Linus, please pull the following changes for 3.3, thanks a lot!
>
> These changes have been on linux-next for a while now.
> They touch a lot of arches and have interdependencies, so merging
> separately seems to make sense, I think.
>
> The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610:
>
> Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800)
So why have you rebased this? All this stuff in in linux-next based on
v3.2-rc3 since December 5 (and that version will be in linux-next today
as well unless you update your linux-next branch in the next sort while).
Is there something in v3.2 that interacts with this series of patches?
If so, then you had better delay your pull request and do more testing.
If not, then *don't rebase*.
(and if you do rebase, please make sure that what goes into linux-next is
the *same commits* (not just the same patches) as what Linus is merging)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature