Re: [GIT PULL] use generic pci_iomap on all architectures
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu Jan 05 2012 - 16:39:28 EST
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:31:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [I am not *just* picking on you - others do this as well ...]
>
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:58:36 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please pull the following changes for 3.3, thanks a lot!
> >
> > These changes have been on linux-next for a while now.
> > They touch a lot of arches and have interdependencies, so merging
> > separately seems to make sense, I think.
> >
> > The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610:
> >
> > Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800)
>
> So why have you rebased this? All this stuff in in linux-next based on
> v3.2-rc3 since December 5 (and that version will be in linux-next today
> as well unless you update your linux-next branch in the next sort while).
OK, seems I was mistaken (and mislead by the above. Your for-linus tag
just tags what is already in linux-next and based on v3.2-rc3 ...
Sorry about that.
So why does you pull request refer to "commit
805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610", I wonder? Is that just what
"git request-pull" produced?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature