Re: [PATCH] mce: fix warning messages about static struct mce_device

From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Jan 17 2012 - 10:53:46 EST


On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:38:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> > index f35ce43..6aefb14 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> > @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static inline void enable_p5_mce(void) {}
> >
> > void mce_setup(struct mce *m);
> > void mce_log(struct mce *m);
> > -DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct device, mce_device);
> > +extern struct device *mce_device[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
>
> Minor nit, i don't think we have any other such [CONFIG_NR_CPUS]
> pattern in the kernel.
>
> This should be something like:
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct device *, mce_device);

That is what we used to have, but with just a static struct device. We
really don't need this to be in the per-cpu area, a flat array should be
just fine, why can't we use the CONFIG_NR_CPUS value? Should we use
something else?

> Or the pointer should be attached to the CPU info structure.

Ok, I have no objection to that, do you want me to make a patch doing
that, now that this is already in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/