Re: [PATCH] trace: don't print an extra separator of flags

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Mon Feb 20 2012 - 13:09:14 EST


On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:16 +0300, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> From: Andrey Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> It occurs if __print_flags is used more than once

Hi, which tracepoint does this? I like to see what the issue is.

Thanks,

-- Steve

>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> index 0d6ff35..3efd718 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ ftrace_print_flags_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const char *delim,
> unsigned long mask;
> const char *str;
> const char *ret = p->buffer + p->len;
> - int i;
> + int i, first = 1;
>
> for (i = 0; flag_array[i].name && flags; i++) {
>
> @@ -310,8 +310,10 @@ ftrace_print_flags_seq(struct trace_seq *p, const char *delim,
>
> str = flag_array[i].name;
> flags &= ~mask;
> - if (p->len && delim)
> + if (!first && delim)
> trace_seq_puts(p, delim);
> + else
> + first = 0;
> trace_seq_puts(p, str);
> }
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/