Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

[Turquette, Mike]

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another trivial comment.  But if there is an incremental patch, maybe
> consider to include it.
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> ...
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DISABLE_UNUSED
>> +static int clk_disable_unused(void)
>> +{
>> +     struct clk *clk;
>> +     struct hlist_node *tmp;
>> +
>> +     mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
>> +
>> +     hlist_for_each_entry(clk, tmp, &clk_root_list, child_node)
>> +             clk_disable_unused_subtree(clk);
>> +
>> +     hlist_for_each_entry(clk, tmp, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
>> +             clk_disable_unused_subtree(clk);
>> +
>> +     mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int clk_disable_unused(struct clk *clk) { return 0; }
>
> This #else block seems completely unnecessary to me.
>
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DISABLE_UNUSED */

Oops.  This is a leftover from when there was a separate
drivers/clk/clk-debug.c which implemented this stuff.  I'll make a
cleanup series and roll all these little things into it.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/