Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

[Shawn Guo]

On 21 March 2012 07:46, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@xxxxxx> wrote:
...
> As mentioned above, you'll still need to check for CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
> in your .round_rate implementation with __clk_get_flags(hw->clk).
>
For my particular case, the clk is PLL with fixed rate clk
(oscillator) as parent.  It's known that flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT will
never be set for this type of clks.

> Did you want to send a formal patch or just have me absorb this into
> the fixes I'm brewing already?  I've already fixed the potential null
> ptr dereferences in clk_calc_new_rates, but that's no big deal.
>
The code was attached for better discussion, and I would leave the
formal patch to you.

Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/