[PATCH] x86: Use safe_halt() instead of halt() in acpi_idle_play_dead()

[Boris Ostrovsky]

Using halt() in acpi_idle_play_dead() breaks ia64 build. Use safe_halt()
instead.

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 6b1d32a..784f9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
 	while (1) {
 
 		if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT)
-			halt();
+			safe_halt();
 		else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) {
 			inb(cx->address);
 			/* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */
-- 
1.7.3.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/