Re: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800
Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend
> for correct this. Please reply this resend email. 
> 
> ---------------
> Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for
> potential bisection convenience.
> 
> Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace
> patches and final dead code clean up patch. 
> 
> The net, xen and x86 part code are independent. 
> 
> After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code
> do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch
> at that time. 
> 
> Any further comments are appreciated!
> 

I'm still sitting on these patches.  The review was a bit inconclusive
and confusing and everyone will have forgotten all about everything.  I
think I'll drop them and ask for a resend, please.

Be sure to update the changelogs so that they address everything which
was discussed last time - so we don't end up covering the same ground. 
Please also Cc everyone who was involved in the discussion last time.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/