Re: [PATH v2 0/5] Code clean up for percpu_xxx serial functions
From: Alex Shi
Date: Fri May 04 2012 - 21:09:50 EST
On 05/05/2012 05:29 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:53:33 +0800
> Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I am sorry for spelling mistaken on konrad's email address, so resend
>> for correct this. Please reply this resend email.
>>
>> ---------------
>> Thanks for TJ's suggestion, I split the serial patch smaller for
>> potential bisection convenience.
>>
>> Compare to v1 patch, this v2 patches has separate function replace
>> patches and final dead code clean up patch.
>>
>> The net, xen and x86 part code are independent.
>>
>> After each part was accepted in kernel, the final(5th) clean up code
>> do the real clean up in next merge window. I will refresh the patch
>> at that time.
>>
>> Any further comments are appreciated!
>>
>
> I'm still sitting on these patches. The review was a bit inconclusive
> and confusing and everyone will have forgotten all about everything. I
> think I'll drop them and ask for a resend, please.
>
> Be sure to update the changelogs so that they address everything which
> was discussed last time - so we don't end up covering the same ground.
> Please also Cc everyone who was involved in the discussion last time.
>
Thanks for comments. I will try to refresh this upon mm tree next week.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/