RE: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-inmodule EEPROM

[Yaniv Rosner]

> On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact
> > Subject line.
> >
> > Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what
> > is different in each of these changes.
> >
> > There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review
> > them?  If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it?  If not, why not?
> 
> Sorry, I've been busy with another project.  I'll reply to Stuart's
> patches faster next round.
> 
> Ben.

Hi Stuart,
It's been 3 weeks since you sent the initial patch series which were not
accepted. Please reply if you're going to resubmit fixed patches soon,
otherwise I'll take over, and complete this task from where you left it.

Thanks much,
Yaniv

> 
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_