RE: [PATCH net-next 1/3] Add capability to retrieve plug-in moduleEEPROM

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun May 06 2012 - 18:06:37 EST


On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 08:02 +0000, Yaniv Rosner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 17:28 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > > You can't just submit three seperate patches each with the same exact
> > > Subject line.
> > >
> > > Otherwise someone scanning the commit headers can't figure out what
> > > is different in each of these changes.
> > >
> > > There also is no signoff from Ben for patches #2 or #3, did he review
> > > them? If so, why didn't he ACK or sign off on it? If not, why not?
> >
> > Sorry, I've been busy with another project. I'll reply to Stuart's
> > patches faster next round.
> >
> > Ben.
>
> Hi Stuart,
> It's been 3 weeks since you sent the initial patch series which were not
> accepted. Please reply if you're going to resubmit fixed patches soon,
> otherwise I'll take over, and complete this task from where you left it.

I'll be making a pull request including Stuart's patches in the next few
days.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/