Re: [PATCH 1/3] uprobes: install_breakpoint() should fail ifis_swbp_insn() == T

[Srikar Dronamraju]

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> [2012-06-01 17:53:12]:

> On 05/31, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > __find_next_vma_info() checks tmpvi->mm == vma->vm_mm to detect the
> > already visited mm/vma. However, afaics this can be false positive?
> 
> Yes, but I guess this is harmless, we can rely on uprobe_mmap.
> 
> 
> 
> But. Doesn't this mean we can greatly simplify register_for_each_vma()
> and make it O(n) ?
> 
> Unless I missed something, we can simply create the list of
> mm/vaddr structures under ->i_mmap_mutex (vma_prio_tree_foreach), then
> register_for_each_vma() can process the list and that is all.


If I remember correctly, we cannot allocate the list elements under
i_mmap_mutex. We dont know how many list elements to allocate.

This is what Peter had to say : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/27/72

"Because we try to take i_mmap_mutex during reclaim, trying to unmap
pages. So suppose we do an allocation while holding i_mmap_mutex, find
there's no free memory, try and unmap a page in order to free it, and
we're stuck."

> 
> If another mapping comes after we drop i_mmap_mutex, uprobe_mmap()
> should be called and it should install the bp.
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/