Re: [PATCH] x86: remove the useless branch in c_start()

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 01:42 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
> > Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle '*pos == 0'
> > specially.
> > 
> > About the comments:
> > 	/* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
> > A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been done, and it
> > works well.
> 
> Could I get some comments on this patch?

Looks ok to me:

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/