Re: [PATCH] x86: remove the useless branch in c_start()

[Michael Wang]

On 09/26/2012 09:02 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:43:52AM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 09/19/2012 01:42 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle '*pos == 0'
>>> specially.
>>>
>>> About the comments:
>>> 	/* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
>>> A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been done, and it
>>> works well.
>>
>> Could I get some comments on this patch?
> 
> Looks ok to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks.

Thanks for your review.

Regards,
Michael Wang
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/