Re: Is not locking task_lock in cgroup_fork() safe?
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Oct 18 2012 - 20:38:32 EST
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > For now, I'll revert the patches and cc stable. Let's think about
> > improving it later.
> Ok for reverting in cgroup_fork(). Is it necessary for the
> cgroup_post_fork() thing? I don't immediately see any race involved
Even if there isn't an actual race, the comment is dead wrong. I'm
reverting the following three patches. Let's try again later.
7e381b0eb1 ("cgroup: Drop task_lock(parent) on cgroup_fork()")
7e3aa30ac8 ("cgroup: Remove task_lock() from cgroup_post_fork()")
c84cdf75cc ("cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration")
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/