Re: [PATCH v2] Fix a hard coding style when determining if a deviceis a container.

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Tue Oct 23 2012 - 12:00:38 EST


On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "ACPI0004","PNP0A05" and "PNP0A06" are all defined in array
> container_device_ids[], so use it, but not the hard coding style.
>
> Also, introduce a new api is_container_device() to determine if a
> device is a container device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me, but is_container_device() should be of type "bool",
not type "int".

With that change,

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/acpi/container.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/container.c b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> index 1f9f7d7..ffd76ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/container.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,19 @@ static int is_device_present(acpi_handle handle)
> return ((sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) == ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT);
> }
>
> +static int is_container_device(const char *hid)
> +{
> + const struct acpi_device_id *container_id;
> +
> + for (container_id = container_device_ids;
> + container_id->id[0]; container_id++) {
> + if (!strcmp((char *)container_id->id, hid))
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*******************************************************************/
> static int acpi_container_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> @@ -232,10 +245,8 @@ container_walk_namespace_cb(acpi_handle handle,
> goto end;
> }
>
> - if (strcmp(hid, "ACPI0004") && strcmp(hid, "PNP0A05") &&
> - strcmp(hid, "PNP0A06")) {
> + if (!is_container_device(hid))
> goto end;
> - }
>
> switch (*action) {
> case INSTALL_NOTIFY_HANDLER:
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/