[PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: Having slew rate settings for otherthan SM0/1 is not fatal

[Axel Lin]

Ignore the setting and show "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate" warning is enough,
then we can return 0 instead of -EINVAL in tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate().

Otherwise, probe() fails.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
index e68382d..51da3f9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6586x-regulator.c
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static int tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		break;
 	default:
 		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	return tps6586x_write(parent, reg,
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/