Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps6586x: Having slew rate settings for otherthan SM0/1 is not fatal

[Stephen Warren]

On 02/16/2013 04:50 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Ignore the setting and show "Only SM0/SM1 can set slew rate" warning is enough,
> then we can return 0 instead of -EINVAL in tps6586x_regulator_set_slew_rate().
> 
> Otherwise, probe() fails.

Why does probe() fail; what is trying to set a slew rate on a regulator
that doesn't support it? At least a few days ago in linux-next, this
patch wasn't needed AFAIK. Is the problem something new?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/