Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data ifrunning&&queued

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Lai.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:04:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> (But are patch 1, 5-8 possible merged after rebased and revised?)

0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't
necessary.  In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed
eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply
0001.

0002 looks good to me.

0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes.

0006-0008 yeah, probably.

I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/