Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data ifrunning&&queued

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, again.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:27:50AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't
> necessary.  In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed
> eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply
> 0001.
> 
> 0002 looks good to me.
> 
> 0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes.
> 
> 0006-0008 yeah, probably.
> 
> I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.

So, I picked and applied 2, 6-8 on a temp branch.  FYI, note that I'm
currently sitting on top of a bunch of patches implementing custom
worker_pools and likely to prioritize them over other conflicting
changes.  I'm expecting to send these out in a week or so.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/