Re: sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d
> > Commit:     c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d
> > Parent:     e0a79f529d5ba2507486d498b25da40911d95cf6
> > Author:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300
> > Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CommitDate: Tue Feb 5 12:59:29 2013 +0100
> >
> >     sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to()
> >
> >     In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and
> >     target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so
> >     it needs to be signed.
> 
> Dan, Ingo,
> 
> I can't find the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when 
> source and target runqueue has one task" in the latest Linus's 
> git. Am I missing something.
> 
> The current kenel/sched/core.c doesn't have the code from the
> associated patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2016651/

As per the lkml discussion that one was supposed to go upstream 
via the KVM tree. Marcelo?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/