Re: sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to()

[Raghavendra KT]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
>> <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d
>> > Commit:     c3c186403c6abd32e719f005f0af950155a9e54d
>> > Parent:     e0a79f529d5ba2507486d498b25da40911d95cf6
>> > Author:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 5 14:37:51 2013 +0300
>> > Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CommitDate: Tue Feb 5 12:59:29 2013 +0100
>> >
>> >     sched: Fix signedness bug in yield_to()
>> >
>> >     In 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when source and
>> >     target runqueue has one task" we changed this to store -ESRCH so
>> >     it needs to be signed.
>>
>> Dan, Ingo,
>>
>> I can't find the 7b270f6099 "sched: Bail out of yield_to when
>> source and target runqueue has one task" in the latest Linus's
>> git. Am I missing something.
>>
>> The current kenel/sched/core.c doesn't have the code from the
>> associated patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2016651/
>
> As per the lkml discussion that one was supposed to go upstream
> via the KVM tree. Marcelo?
>

It is going via KVM tree. (as per Gleb's pull request)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/