Re: [PATCH 1/1] memory: tegra_ahb_enable_smmu() depends onTEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:54:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 10:30 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:16:35 +0200 (EET):
> > 
> >> Hi Russell,
> >>
> >> Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote @ Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:51:46 +0100:
> >>
> >>> On 02/06/2013 11:34 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> >>>> New SoC, Tegra114 also uses SMMU. Change tegra_ahb_enable_smmu()'s
> >>>> dependency from ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC to TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU. No need to edit
> >>>> whenever a new Tegra SoC comes.
> >>>>
> >>>> The following combination caused build error, which this patch fixes.
> >>>>
> >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC=y
> >>>> \# CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC is not set
> >>>> CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC=y
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c:485: undefined reference to 'tegra_ahb_enable_smmu'
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Russell, I assume Hiroshi should upload this to your patch tracker? It's
> >>> needed for 3.9.
> >>
> >> FYI: Submitted as:
> >> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7640/1
> > 
> > Russell,
> > 
> > Is the above ok for you?
> > Please let me know if still I need to do something.
> 
> Russell, will this patch make it into your tree for 3.9? Do you think it
> should go through some other tree? Thanks.

I'll merge it, and I think it's a minor fix.  Should it be copied to
stable?  If so, which ones are affected?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/