Re: [patch v5 09/15] sched: add power aware scheduling infork/exec/wake

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:23 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> > But but but,... nr_running is completely unrelated to utilization.
> > 
> 
> Actually, I also hesitated on the name, how about using nr_running to
> replace group_util directly?


The name is a secondary issue, first you need to explain why you think
nr_running is a useful metric at all.

You can have a high nr_running and a low utilization (a burst of
wakeups, each waking a process that'll instantly go to sleep again), or
low nr_running and high utilization (a single process cpu bound
process).

There is absolutely no relation between utilization and nr_running,
building something on that assumption is just wrong and broken.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/