Re: [PATCH] idr: Don't WARN in idr_find

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:46:11PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 17:40 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:37:12PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > Since idr is used for syscall apis (to associate 'handles' with
> > > internal structures), don't WARN with invalid input.
> > > 
> > > For example, POSIX timers are identified by timer_t id. These
> > > ids are idr values. If userspace passes a representable timer_t id
> > > value (eg, id < 0) but which was not previous allocated (since the
> > > current idr api does not return negative idr values), then the
> > > syscall properly returns an error; a WARN is unnecessary and
> > > undesirable.
> > 
> > WARN_ON() on negative was intentional.  Because the previous
> > implmentation silently dropped the msb, we at least wanna know who has
> > been passing in negative indices.  Patch for the lock_timer is already
> > in -mm.
> 
> Thanks. Can you share the patch title? It's not in next-20130225.

It's this one.

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1444883/focus=1445094

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/