[PATCH 1/1] kernel/nsproxy.c: Improving a snippet of code.

[Raphael S.Carvalho]

It seems GCC generates a better code in that way, so I changed that statement.
Btw, they have the same semantic, so I'm sending this patch due to performance issues.

Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/nsproxy.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c
index 78e2ecb..21da3d1 100644
--- a/kernel/nsproxy.c
+++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c
@@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ int copy_namespaces(unsigned long flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	 * means share undolist with parent, so we must forbid using
 	 * it along with CLONE_NEWIPC.
 	 */
-	if ((flags & CLONE_NEWIPC) && (flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM)) {
+	if ((flags & (CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) ==
+		(CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_SYSVSEM)) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/