Re: [PATCH -v5 5/5] Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter.

From: Robin Holt
Date: Wed Apr 17 2013 - 15:48:43 EST


On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 11:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Moving the reboot=s<##> parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
> > proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
> > reboot cpu.
> >
> > I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
> > takes precedence. I also fixed up the current code to support
> > up to cpuid's up to the current max of 4096.
> >
>
> I still don't understand why you insist on introducing a new parameter
> rather than just supporting the existing, somewhat ugly, syntax: it is
> rare enough to need that the compatibility wins over the aestetics.

Did you see my response I sent this morning?

I would really like to try and remove the apparently unused reboot=
parameter from arm and unicore32 as well. Does anybody have a concern
with that? That should make documenting slightly easier.

> Furthermore that word "cpuid" that you keep using, I don't think it
> means what you think it means...

If we stayed with the core_param, would you prefer reboot_processor=###
over reboot_cpuid=###?

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/