Re: [PATCH -v5 5/5] Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter.

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 04/17/2013 12:48 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> 
> Did you see my response I sent this morning?
> 

I did not, although I just read it.

I have a hard time seeing maintaining backwards/forwards compatibility
as "very wrong" ... it would seem like a pretty major concern.  In
comparison losing the currently nonexistent /sys file seems like a
rather minor issue.

My suggestion would be to have a universal parser for reboot= and have
the arch functions fed data in already parsed form.

> I would really like to try and remove the apparently unused reboot=
> parameter from arm and unicore32 as well.  Does anybody have a concern
> with that?  That should make documenting slightly easier.

You have to ask the arm and unicore32 maintainers that, obviously.

>> Furthermore that word "cpuid" that you keep using, I don't think it
>> means what you think it means...
> 
> If we stayed with the core_param, would you prefer reboot_processor=###
> over reboot_cpuid=###?

reboot_cpu=<n>

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/