Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/arm: actually pass a non-NULL percpu pointerto request_percpu_irq

[Ian Campbell]

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 20:28 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ian Campbell <ian.camjpbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> index 8dc0605..99ce189 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int __init xen_init_events(void)
>  	xen_init_IRQ();
>  
>  	if (request_percpu_irq(xen_events_irq, xen_arm_callback,
> -			"events", xen_vcpu)) {
> +			"events", &xen_vcpu)) {
>  		pr_err("Error requesting IRQ %d\n", xen_events_irq);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/