Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29

[Randy Dunlap]

On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20130426:
> 


(who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?)


on x86_64:

warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU)

because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled.


Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS?

and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt,
which does not exist.  Please add the file.


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/