On Fri 07-06-13 17:13:55, Piotr Nowojski wrote:W dniu 06.06.2013 17:57, Michal Hocko pisze:OK, good. Your numbers suggeste that the hierachy _is_ in use. I justSystem has been rebooted since last test, so I can not guaranteeI assume that memory.use_hierarchy is 1, right?In our system we have hit some very annoying situation (bug?) with
cgroups. I'm writing to you, because I have found your posts on
mailing lists with similar topic. Maybe you could help us or point
some direction where to look for/ask.
We have system with ~15GB RAM (+2GB SWAP), and we are running ~10
heavy IO processes. Each process is using constantly 200-210MB RAM
(RSS) and a lot of page cache. All processes are in cgroup with
following limits:
/sys/fs/cgroup/taskell2 $ cat memory.limit_in_bytes
memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
14183038976
15601344512
that it was set for 100%, but it should have been. Currently I'm
rerunning this scenario that lead to the described problem with:
/sys/fs/cgroup/taskell2# cat memory.use_hierarchy ../memory.use_hierarchy
1
0
wanted to be 100% sure.