Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume

[Srivatsa S. Bhat]

On 07/11/2013 07:33 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> 2013/7/11 Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
 
>> I tried to address all these in this patch, but you found yet another serious
>> loop-hole. I guess I'm out of ideas now... if anybody has any thoughts on how
>> to get this right, then I'm all ears. Else, we'll just revert the original
>> commit like Rafael suggested and leave it upto userspace to save and restore
>> the permissions across suspend/resume if it wants ;-(
>>
> 
> How about implement scaling driver's suspend/resume callback()? Although this
> needs to be dealt with case by case. If one's callbacks hasn't been implemented,
> it would have to follow current rule.
> 

Well, I'm now trying a slightly different approach at reorganizing the code,
and so far I think I'll be able to get it right this time. Let's see how it goes.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/