[PATCH 96/98] printk: Fix rq->lock vs logbuf_lock unlock lock inversion

[Luis Henriques]

3.5.7.17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Bu, Yitian" <ybu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit dbda92d16f8655044e082930e4e9d244b87fde77 upstream.

commit 07354eb1a74d1 ("locking printk: Annotate logbuf_lock as raw")
reintroduced a lock inversion problem which was fixed in commit
0b5e1c5255 ("printk: Release console_sem after logbuf_lock"). This
happened probably when fixing up patch rejects.

Restore the ordering and unlock logbuf_lock before releasing
console_sem.

Signed-off-by: ybu <ybu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/E807E903FE6CBE4D95E420FBFCC273B827413C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 5758501..e959512 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -1330,9 +1330,9 @@ static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
 		}
 	}
 	logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
 	if (wake)
 		up(&console_sem);
-	raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
 	return retval;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/