Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Jul 19 2013 - 15:25:25 EST


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > ---------------
> > Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing.
> > Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible.
> > ---------------
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release.
> > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Greg,
>
> Build failed with the following error:
>
> LD ipc/built-in.o
> CC [M] fs/cifs/inode.o
> fs/cifs/inode.c: In function âcifs_all_info_to_fattrâ:
> fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> âcifs_dbgâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> CC security/selinux/hooks.o
>
> I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled.
> cifs_dbg() is not defined.

Ugh, I thought I fixed that one... I did it for the 3.4 and other
trees, I'll go see what I did wrong...

thanks for letting me know,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/