Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > ---------------
> > > Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing.
> > > Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible.
> > > ---------------
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release.
> > > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > >
> > 
> > Greg,
> > 
> > Build failed with the following error:
> > 
> >    LD      ipc/built-in.o
> >    CC [M]  fs/cifs/inode.o
> > fs/cifs/inode.c: In function âcifs_all_info_to_fattrâ:
> > fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function 
> > âcifs_dbgâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
> > make: *** [fs] Error 2
> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >    CC      security/selinux/hooks.o
> > 
> > I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled. 
> > cifs_dbg() is not defined.
> 
> Ugh, I thought I fixed that one...  I did it for the 3.4 and other
> trees, I'll go see what I did wrong...

Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when
I tried it again, it failed.  Before it wasn't, odd...

Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at:
 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz

If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do
anything stupid with this one too.

Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was
not a good review cycle...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/