On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:There's no change from v2. I was sending the same patch again because the last one was lacking good description and i was told (or as i understood) that if I'm sending the same patch or patch for the same purpose as previous then i should increment version so i did.This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use xhci_hcd argument.Could you put a list of changes since v2 here?:
Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments.
Redefining this function breaks other functions which calls this function.
This phatch also correct those calls in xhci driver.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: blah blah changelog mostly.
Also this doesn't apply for me against linux-next.
regards,
dan carpenter