Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tool: don't print bogus data on -e cycles

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When only the cycles event is requested:
> 
> $ perf stat -e cycles dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=1000000
> 1000000+0 records in
> 1000000+0 records out
> 512000000 bytes (512 MB) copied, 0.26123 s, 2.0 GB/s
> 
>  Performance counter stats for 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=1000000':
> 
>        911,626,453 cycles                    #    0.000 GHz
> 
>        0.262113350 seconds time elapsed
> 
> The 0.000 GHz comment in the output is totally bogus and misleading. It
> happens because update_shadow_stats() doesn't touch runtime_nsecs_stats;
> it is only written when a requested counter matches a SW_TASK_CLOCK. In
> our case, since we have only requested HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> runtime_nsecs_stats is unavailable. So, omit printing the comment
> altogether.
> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/