Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
> and ready to go.  Not so with these releases.  Maybe it's the horrid
> weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
> something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
> screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
> the build every other patch.  Some developers decided to get into the
> act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
> patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
> times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
> take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...
>
> Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
> trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
> run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.
>
> You have been warned.
>
> -----------------

Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. 
No dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions 
in warn.

-- Shuah


--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/