Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
> >and ready to go.  Not so with these releases.  Maybe it's the horrid
> >weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
> >something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
> >screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
> >the build every other patch.  Some developers decided to get into the
> >act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
> >patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
> >times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
> >take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...
> >
> >Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
> >trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
> >run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.
> >
> >You have been warned.
> >
> >-----------------
> >
> 
> Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. No
> dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in
> warn.

Great, thanks for testing all 4 of these, I feel better about them now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/