Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 02/15] ASoC: dapm: Add locked version of snd_soc_dapm_xxxx_pin functions

[Charles Keepax]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:30:30AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:06:03PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> 
> > Hm, this is a bit confusing. For other functions in ASoC when we
> > have a pair of functions with the _locked suffix and without the one
> > with _locked takes the lock, the other one doesn't. E.g.
> > snd_soc_update_bits_locked. Here we do it the other way around.
> 
> Yes, this is definitely confusing.  The existing naming might not be the
> best but making things inconsistent isn't going to help the situation
> either.

Oops... sorry that was not intentional I will respin to correct
this.

Thanks,
Charles

> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/