Re: [PATCH 07/16] ioprio: Add a macro named NICE_TO_IOPRIO.
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Mar 11 2014 - 05:29:19 EST
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:20:28PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> As the task nice value is in [-20, 19] and the io priority is in [0, 7],
> and the convert method from niceval to ioprio is implemented with an
> opened code in task_nice_ioprio().
>
> This patch move the implementation to a macro NICE_TO_IOPRIO, making
> it more readable and modular.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/ioprio.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ioprio.h b/include/linux/ioprio.h
> index beb9ce1..c0faa0b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ioprio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ioprio.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
> #define ioprio_valid(mask) (IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS((mask)) != IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE)
>
> /*
> + * Convert the nice value [19,-20] to io priority value [0,7].
> + */
> +#define NICE_TO_IOPRIO(nice) (nice_to_rlimit(nice) / 5)
> +
> +/*
> * These are the io priority groups as implemented by CFQ. RT is the realtime
> * class, it always gets premium service. BE is the best-effort scheduling
> * class, the default for any process. IDLE is the idle scheduling class, it
> @@ -52,7 +57,7 @@ enum {
> */
> static inline int task_nice_ioprio(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> - return (task_nice(task) + 20) / 5;
> + return NICE_TO_IOPRIO(task_nice(task));
> }
How exactly is adding a macro and code complexity making this code
better?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/