Re: [PATCH 00/12] scsi/NCR5380: fix debugging macros and #include structure

[Joe Perches]

On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 10:14 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> As for side-effects, chip register accesses would be affected if dprintk() 
> expanded to no_printk() when NDEBUG & flg == 0.
> 
> E.g. NCR5380.c line 1213:
> dprintk(NDEBUG_INTR, "scsi : unknown interrupt, BASR 0x%X, MR 0x%X, SR 0x%x\n",
>                      basr, NCR5380_read(MODE_REG), NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG));
> 
> I don't want to re-introduce side-effects into a dozen different NCR5380 
> drivers on three different architectures when I can test only one of those 
> drivers. It's difficult to get good code coverage even for one driver.

Hi again Finn.

If dprintk expanded directly to no_printk, then true.

But using "if (0)" prevents the no_printk from
occurring at all so there would be no side-effects
and the format & args would still be verified by the
compiler.

So I believe you shouldn't worry about side-effects.

cheers, Joe


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/