Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

From: Robert Nelson
Date: Thu Mar 20 2014 - 11:15:37 EST

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:10 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 1. change the DT compatible strings the driver has to accept both
>> nxp,tda19988 and nxp,tda19989, and set the appropriate device
>> in the DT file (tda19988). I'm a bit nervous about using
>> "nxp,tda1998x" in case we're clashing with devices with different
>> characteristics.
> The Cubox is sold with either the TDA19988 or the TDA19989 (I don't
> know about the AMX33XX boards). Then, setting the exact type in the DT
> would ask for 2 differents DTs or for having two tda998x definitions in
> a same DT...


On the AM335x (BeagleBone Black), the NXP's chip ink shows, 88BHN so TDA19988


Robert Nelson
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at