Re: [PATCH] ASoC: tda998x: Fix lack of required reg in DT documentation

[Robert Nelson]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:10 +0000
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 1. change the DT compatible strings the driver has to accept both
>>    nxp,tda19988 and nxp,tda19989, and set the appropriate device
>>    in the DT file (tda19988).  I'm a bit nervous about using
>>    "nxp,tda1998x" in case we're clashing with devices with different
>>    characteristics.
>
> The Cubox is sold with either the TDA19988 or the TDA19989 (I don't
> know about the AMX33XX boards). Then, setting the exact type in the DT
> would ask for 2 differents DTs or for having two tda998x definitions in
> a same DT...

fyi:

On the AM335x (BeagleBone Black), the NXP's chip ink shows, 88BHN so TDA19988

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/