Re: [PATCH] printk: Fix discarding of records
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Mar 21 2014 - 11:31:21 EST
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:18:13AM -0500, Josh Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Banerjee, Debabrata
> <dbanerje@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2/16/14, 7:41 PM, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Banerjee, Debabrata
> >><dbanerje@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No that can't be right, the prev value after every loop is the
> >>>msg->flags
> >>> from the *last* line in the list, which has no relation to the *first*,
> >>>so
> >>> reusing it for the top of the next loop is nonsense.
> >>
> >>Please, Debabrata, humor me, and just try the patch.
> >>
> >>And try reading the source code. Because your statement is BS.
> > ...
> >>No, I haven't tested my patch, and maybe it's broken for some subtle
> >>reason I'm missing too.
> >
> > Yes my explanation was wrong, your patch works for me. I assumed printing
> > the prefix was desired, but if not, great.
>
> The resulting patch from this discussion:
>
> commit e4178d809fdaee32a56833fff1f5056c99e90a1a
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Feb 17 12:24:45 2014 -0800
>
> printk: fix syslog() overflowing user buffer
>
> has not made it into stable yet. Can we add it to the stable queue?
> I'm not sure if it needs more bake time, etc.
I'll queue it up for the next round of stable releases after this one,
thanks for pointing it out.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/