Re: [PATCH] compat_audit: allow it to work without asm/unistd32.h

[AKASHI Takahiro]

On 03/25/2014 01:39 AM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The problem is that audit_is_compat() is a dynamic test that the compiler
> can't optimize away, so you end with an undefined reference to
> audit_classify_compat_syscall().
>
> For some reason audit_classify_compat_syscall() is declared as __weak
> in <linux/audit.h>; usually the __weak tag is only provided on the definition.
> But I suppose you could imagine providing a weak definition in lib/audit.c
> itself.

I still believe that a function can be declared with __weak and replaced
by a strong definition later on (at link time).
But this is not the case anyway.

> Or there could be a CONFIG_AUDIT_COMPAT symbol that architectures need to
> set if they want to have audit_is_compat() return anything other than "false",
> and then just use that symbol in the #ifdef in <uapi/linux/audit.h>.  In that
> case the compiler would optimize away the call to audit_classify_compat_syscall().
>
> My guess is that the second option is probably cleanest.

Yep, but I don't want to add new CONFIG_AUDIT_COMPAT symbol just for
audit_is_compat() because it is only used in lib/audit.c(AUDIT_GENERIC).
Instead, I prefer
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_COMPAT_GENERIC
#define audit_is_compat(arch) (...)
#else
#define audit_is_compat(arch) false
#endif

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> On 3/24/2014 12:21 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > I don't know tilegx, but I have replaced 223b24d807610 with
> > 4b58841149dcaa5.  I believe adding AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC was
> > akashi-san's  fix for this problem on mips.  Is this a better fix?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Eric
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 11:31 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > > For architectures that use the asm-generic syscall table for both
> > > 32- and 64-bit, there should be no need to provide a separate
> > > <asm/unistd32.h>; just using <linux/unistd.h> is sufficient.
> > > Conditionalize use of <asm/unistd32.h> on the one platform that
> > > currently requires it (arm64).  If another platform ends up needing
> > > it we can create a suitable config flag at that point.
> > >
> > > This change fixes the tilegx build failure seen in linux-next.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > By the way - I also note that commit 223b24d807610 that introduced
> > > this also put an "#ifdef COMPAT_xxx" in a UAPI header.  This seems
> > > like a pretty clear signal that the added code should be in
> > > linux/include/audit.h, not linux/uapi/include/audit.h.  But here
> > > I'm just focussing on getting tilegx to continue to build...
> > >
> > >   lib/compat_audit.c | 7 ++++++-
> > >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/compat_audit.c b/lib/compat_audit.c
> > > index 873f75b640ab..e89a84b3fbe8 100644
> > > --- a/lib/compat_audit.c
> > > +++ b/lib/compat_audit.c
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
> > >   #include <linux/init.h>
> > >   #include <linux/types.h>
> > > -#include <asm/unistd32.h>
> > > +#ifdef COMPAT_ARM64
> > > +/* 64-bit syscalls are generic, but 32-bit are not. */
> > > +# include <asm/unistd32.h>
> > > +#else
> > > +# include <linux/unistd.h>
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > >   unsigned compat_dir_class[] = {
> > >   #include <asm-generic/audit_dir_write.h>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/