Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead od BIT(bit)

[Alexandre Courbot]

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> d->mask contains exact the same information as BIT(bit) so we could save
> a few cycles here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index 3c9cdda..ebfcf5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
>
>         irq_gc_lock(igc);
>         val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
> -       val |= BIT(d->hwirq);
> +       val |= d->mask;
>         writel(val, gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
>         irq_gc_unlock(igc);
>  }
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void dwapb_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
>
>         irq_gc_lock(igc);
>         val = readl(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTEN);
> -       val &= ~BIT(d->hwirq);
> +       val &= d->mask;

Shouldn't that be ~d->mask here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/