Re: [PATCH V2] Add support for flag status register on Micron chips.

[Graham Moore]

On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>> +#define      OPCODE_RDFSR            0x70  /* read flag status register */
>
> I know this is not your fault, but can you please indent this properly with
> tabs?
>
>>  #define      OPCODE_NORM_READ        0x03    /* Read data bytes (low
> frequency) */
>>  #define      OPCODE_FAST_READ        0x0b    /* Read data bytes (high
> frequency) */
>>  #define      OPCODE_QUAD_READ        0x6b    /* Read data bytes */
>
> And fix this one in a separate patch to use tabs as well please ?

I'm rebasing on l2-mtd spinor, and the tabs are jacked up there too.
I'll fix the
one I added, and fix other tabs in a new patch on that branch.

[...]
> I wonder, can't wait_till_ready() be made a wrapper that will check the USE_FSR
> flag and call correct wait-function ? This would avoid adding a new member to
> *flash and also would avoid so many changes throughout the code. What do you
> think?

Yeah, that's kind of ugly, but the flags exist only in the static
m25p_ids[] and are only
used in the scan/init.  I'd have to add a new member to save them for
later use.
And then other uses would crop up.  So, seemed kinda iffy either way.

It's going to change anyway, because l2-mtd spinor branch has refactored
wait_till_ready() such that it uses a function pointer from the new
spi_nor struct.
I'm still mulling it over :)

Thanks,
-Graham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/